secure act

In the SECURE Act Era, You’ll Need a New Retirement Strategy. Roth Conversions Could Be It.

Share Post: facebook Created with Sketch. twitter Created with Sketch. linkedin Created with Sketch. mail Created with Sketch. print Created with Sketch.

By Jamie Hopkins, Director of Retirement Research

Get ready for a new normal.

With the SECURE Act comes the demise of the stretch strategy – and that could cost your loved ones if you don’t revisit your retirement income plan.

It’s long been common practice to stretch IRA and 401(k) distributions over the life of the beneficiary. A smart strategy for two reasons:

  • It allows the tax-advantaged nature of retirement accounts to continue for years, even decades. Investments continue to grow tax-deferred inside of the IRA or 401(k). 
  • Spreading out the taxable distributions can help reduce the tax burden.

But when the SECURE Act goes into effect – expected on Jan. 1, 2020 – beneficiaries will have to fully distribute taxable accounts within 10 years of the account holder’s death. That could push your loved ones into a higher tax bracket.

The stretch strategy’s undoing is no surprise: It’s been proposed for years in government, because it would generate generous tax revenue. The SECURE Act is expected to raise roughly $16.4 billion in revenue over the next 10 years. Almost all of it – $15.7 billion of the $16.4 billion – will come from the elimination of the stretch option.

Is there a viable alternative to the soon-defunct stretch strategy?

We can’t fully replicate the tax-deferred nature of the IRA or 401(k) on inherited accounts. But charitable remainder trusts and insurance products could provide similar benefits. People should focus on more tax-efficient strategies as part of their retirement and estate planning. 

Bracket-bumping Roth conversions is the strategy primed to give beneficiaries a boost in the SECURE Act era.

Reach out to one of our advisors for more information on the Roth conversion strategy.

Roth IRAs will still be subject to the 10-year distribution period under the SECURE Act, but distributions from the Roth won’t impact the beneficiary’s taxable income.

Roth conversions require the account owners to plan in advance. If done correctly, they can cancel out the taxes that come with a shortened distribution period. 

Let’s look at a quick example. You leave $1,000,000 in an IRA to your child – a 40-year-old, single professional who earns $120,000 a year. Under previous rules, they could stretch out distributions over 44 years. The first-year distribution would be about $22,727.27. This wouldn’t push them into a higher tax bracket.

Under the SECURE Act, your child will have to distribute the account over 10 years. They decide to spread it out evenly, taking out $100,000 in the first year. This pushes them up to $220,000 of income with roughly $40,000 of the distribution into the 32% tax bracket and roughly $16,000 of the distribution into the 35% tax bracket. This significantly increases the taxes they’d pay on the IRA.

Instead of leaving the money in an IRA, you can start doing strategic Roth conversions to alleviate that tax burden before you die.

Let’s say one parent was in the 24% tax bracket with $100,000 of income. They could start doing Roth conversions early in retirement to take advantage of their full tax bracket, up to roughly $160,000, without going to the next tax rate.  

The Roth conversation strategy has a lot of value today. It will be even more valuable when distributions are stacked into 10 years under the SECURE Act.

Clients should start working with their advisors now as the SECURE Act is expected to pass in the Senate and be signed into law before the end of the year.

Contact us to start the conversation.

Share:
facebook Created with Sketch. twitter Created with Sketch. linkedin Created with Sketch. mail Created with Sketch. print Created with Sketch.
Share Post: facebook Created with Sketch. twitter Created with Sketch. linkedin Created with Sketch. mail Created with Sketch. print Created with Sketch.

RECENT POSTS

Commission, Fee Based or the Combo?

Published by Jason Comes | @Jason_Comes Which is the best way to compensate someone who helps you with your investments/finances? Would paying per transaction be best or via a percentage of the assets? Do you think the advisor could be objective if he or she would earn a commission investin …

Entrepreneurial Takeaways from Robert Herjavec

Published by Meg Ronspies, Marketing Coordinator “Don’t be boring. Remember that the first thing people buy is people.” Normally seated amongst four other “sharks,” Robert Herjavec shared with attendees of the 2016 Excell Conference some entrepreneurial advice last month.

Using Rationale While Investing

Published by Jake Bleicher and the Carson Wealth Investment Committee A strategic wealth management plan often focuses on investment allocation. Empirical evidence suggests that asset allocation explains 91.5% of return variation over time (Brinson, Singer & Beebower 1991). By that logi …

What My 10 Year Old’s Soccer Team Taught Me about Planning

Published by Paul West | @PaulWestCoach I’ve been a working financial professional for 19 years. I’ve traveled a good amount of that time all across the U.S.; I’ve never freed up my schedule to commit to be a coach for my kid’s activities. This year was different. I agreed to help coach my …
1 2 3 49 50 51 52 53 67 68 69
secure act

Get in Touch

In just 15 minutes we can get to know your situation, then connect you with an advisor committed to helping you pursue true wealth.

Schedule a Consultation